Jennifer Singh is a sociologist of medicine, health, science, and technology. Her research is informed by the interdisciplinary field of science, technology, and medicine studies (ST&MS), which views science and technology as the products of particular social, cultural, political, and historical contexts.Within this framework, she investigates how material conditions and cultures shape scientific inquiry as well as the politics and social consequences of biomedical knowledge and technologies. Her primary research uses qualitative methods, which is combined with her expertise in molecular genetics, public health, and sociology. The scope of her current research examines the social and scientific impacts of emerging technologies used to understand the causes, diagnosis, and meanings of autism. She is currently pursuing several projects that address this line of inquiry.
Multiple Autisms: Spectrums of Advocacy and Genomic Science (University of Minnesota Press, Jan 2016)
This book maps out the social history of parental activism in autism genetics, the scientific optimism and failure of finding a gene for autism, and the various meanings attached to autism in the context of knowledge produced with emerging genomic technologies. Multiple Autisms reveals how parent advocates not only pushed for more autism science but also organized and governed autism genetic research initiatives. This in turn, influenced a shift in scientific practices and created new fields of exchange among scientists and families who participate in genetics research. The analysis also pays close attention to the social impacts of translating autism through a genomic lens by taking into account the various meanings and subjectivities developed based on autism genomic knowledge. This book demonstrates how despite the billion-dollar pursuit of unraveling the genetics of autism, the utility of genomic information has limited value in the immediate lives of people living every day with autism. Ultimately, Multiple Autisms argues that the persistent focus on genetics and now genomic science is fragmenting, reclassifying, renegotiating, and reinventing the social and scientific meanings of autism rather than determining a specific etiology of a single disease.
Participation in Genetics Research
A second line of inquiry investigates the social and moral implication of participating in genetics research based on over 25 interviews with parents who participated in a privately owned autism genomic database, the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC). Based on this research, she published an article, “Narratives of Participation in Autism Genetics Research,” in Science, Technology and Human Values (July 2014). This article provides empirical evidence of the social context and moral reasoning embedded within a parents’ decision to participate in autism genetics research. Based on in-depth interviews of parents who donated their family’s blood and medical information to an autism genetic database, this article demonstrates the limits of a principle-based approach to bioethics and the emergent forms of biological citizenship that takes into account the social situations of people’s lives and the moral reasoning they negotiate when participating in autism genetic research.
There are many aspects of the autism diagnosis that I investigate, including the work parents must engage to get a diagnosis for their child, how the diagnosis of autism operates as a political mechanism for educational services, as well as the ways in which an autism diagnosis serves as a form of identity and/or resistance for autistic communities. In 2011, I published a chapter in Sociology of Diagnosis: Advances in Medical Sociology, titled “The Vanishing Diagnosis of Asperger’s Disorder.” This chapter demonstrates how the 1994 addition of Asperger’s disorder in the DSM-IV opened a gateway for new social identities to become developed and embraced beyond the diagnostic boundaries. Based on interviews with adults who are diagnosed or self-diagnosed with Asperger’s disorder (AD), this chapter shows how the changes to eliminate AD from the DSM-5 threaten the assertions of a positive Asperger identity. This could potentially enhance stigma experienced by people with AD and reduce opportunities for self-disclosure. More importantly, this paper demonstrate how regardless of the removal, Asperger identity must be considered within the broader context of people’s everyday lives and how experiences in social interaction and communication can be strong agents of identity construction.
Parenting Work and Autism Trajectories of Care
I also recently had a paper accepted that theoretically conceptualizes parenting work and autism trajectories of care. This concept articulates how parents embody their child’s autism through creative and proactive forms of parenting work, such as seeking a diagnosis, participating in genetics research, becoming an autism expert, serving as a liaison between various medical and educational professionals, and learning to readjust expectations for the future. This paper has been accepted in Sociology of Health and Illness, a leading international journal, which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, and medicine.
Commercialization of Genetic Testing
In the summer of 2013, I started a new project that investigates the commercialization of autism genetic testing. I am conducting a content analysis of websites, press releases and news articles of over a dozen private companies that are offering an autism genetic testing. Many of these genetic tests are based on rare, and in some cases spontaneous, genetic mutations (as opposed to common and inherited mutations). The genetic risk of autism is detected using new genomic technologies, which can scan over 100,000 genetic markers in one test. This project will investigate the problems associated with the commercialization of autism genetic testing, such as the validity of scientific claims; conflicts of interests in academic and private partnerships; and the bioethics of commercializing knowledge generated through public research investments and altruistic donations of genetic material.
In the summer of 2015, I began an ethnography investigating the inequalities to autism diagnosis and service in metro Atlanta, GA. This project aims to investigate what individual, institutional, and structural barriers contribute to autism inequalities and how they interact with intersecting inequalities based on race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, and gender. The project is a multi-sited ethnography designed to investigate four interlocking social processes: 1) clinical diagnosis; 2) special educational services; 3) social and cultural assistance; and 4) raising a child with autism. This project will trace unexpected social and structural formations across and within multiple sites of activity that will help contextualize and reveal the complex and intersecting mechanisms involved in shaping autism inequalities, which can inform the development of innovative intervention strategies.
Collaboration with Atlanta-Based Scholars
Race and Racism in Contemporary Biomedicine Working Group – Interdisciplinary and Cross-Institutional collaboration among faculty, students, and researchers in Atlanta-based Institutions.
Atlanta Autism Consortium – Organization that works to increase understanding and communication across various stakeholder communities related to autism.
Hughes Spalding Autism Clinic – Dr. Singh is collaborating with Dr. Leslie Rubin and the clinical team at Hughes Spalding Hospital to conduct an investigation on the multi-level inequalities to diagnosis and services. She will also be evaluating the quality of care offered by the clinic and the barriers to diagnosis and services.